Caseless ammunition how does it work




















When you pull the trigger a hammer hits the primer causing the propellant to ignite. This explosion pushes the bullet down the barrel just like normal. It used a. It did not have a primer. When you pulled the trigger, the compressed air was pushed through a small hole which caused the air to heat up very quickly.

Unfortunately the ATF considered this a firearm. Yes, it does function like ammunition should. It goes bang! But it does not meet enough of the requirements of a modern military unit. Therefore it has never gained widespread popularity. A major drawback to caseless ammunition is that it does not hold up to adverse conditions well. The primer and propellant are exposed to the elements.

Soldiers must survive in harsh weather and terrain. They need ammo that can survive in those conditions as well.

The whole idea behind a caseless cartridge is less weight. Less weight means a soldier can carry more ammo. But this is just theoretical since it has never really been put to use. Another theoretical benefit is lack of the need to eject a case. This means a firearm could be less complex because it has fewer steps to complete. Regular ammunition has an ejection process which helps to reduce heat in the chamber. A caseless rifle or grenade launcher builds up way too much heat potentially causing ammo to cook off.

In the case of the H K G11 it was actually more complex because of other steps that had to be added to handle the caseless ammunition. A caseless round using an internal propellant is basically a bullet with a hollowed out end.

The propellant and primer is stored in the hollow. It has special vents that allow the powder to propel the bullet forward. Think of this type of cartridge case like a rocket. The gas vents out the back propelling it toward the target. A solid propellant can be used externally. This solid propellant would be stuffed with a primer and a bullet. The H K G11 rifle famously used a heat resistant square ammo.

This solid block of propellant was then externally ignited. This would propel the bullet away from the gun. The biggest advantage of using caseless ammunition is that it reduces weapon weight because there is nothing needed to hold the cartridge together except the propellant and bullet.

This is in contrast to traditional rounds where you need both an outer metal casing and an inner propellant material. Ammunition size is another benefit of caseless ammo because it can provide the same power as other cartridges while being much smaller.

This means that weapons could be made to have a higher rate of fire without having to increase the size of the weapon. In theory, getting rid of the case will save you 90 grains of weight from each cartridge. It sheds off roughly half the weight from each cartridge. However, it is not the way caseless ammo works since caseless ammunition will not work well by just stacking a primer with loose powder and a bullet. By removing the cartridge case from the system, you also remove the potential source of causing a jam in your firearm.

If you consider the traditional way of using a powder behind the bullet, it makes it easy for the bullet to be broken off from the propellant. Therefore, instead, of using a bullet into the propellant, the bullet is almost encapsulated within the propellant.

It also leads to maintaining a unified cartridge. You do not need a combustible adhesive or a propellant that can be formed to shape. It is because there is no need for the firearm to perform an extraction of the spent case after every shot.

A higher cyclic rate needs a larger capacity magazine, on a more compact weapon. If the firearms community was to popularize the use of caseless ammo again, magazines would probably be different.

The ammo would probably be issued in pre-loaded, tubes or disposable boxes that would slot into the weapon. It would make it potentially simpler as you will not need a complex mechanism to eject the empty case. There will also be no need to use lots of energy to open the breech and reload it. There are lots of potential issues that may arise. It may range from finding a propellant that is moisture-resistant, consistent, reliable, and heat resistant, to a weapon that can chamber ammo different from the common ones.

When using cased ammunition, it is impervious to environmental conditions. It is tough and will resist damage as it can take a lot of heat that may cause the powder inside to spontaneously combust.

The same is not true for caseless ammo. When using traditional ammo, the metal case is an ejected heat sink. Making a weapon that uses caseless ammunition is a hurdle. An example of a firearm that fires caseless ammunition is the HK G It remains the only firearm that was the closest to get an approval into service. The HK G11 looks simple from the outside, as it is just a big brick of a rifle. However, it is well sealed, and this prevents dirt from getting inside.

I am sure there are some groundbreaking ways to develop the HK G11 to a simpler mechanism. But I doubt if there will ever be a simpler way to use a firearm than it is for the cased ammo. The only complication when using cased ammo is the ejection system is somewhat complicated.

But the mechanism is as simple as a flat spring on the side of the bolt that will grip the rim of the cartridge to extract the case from the chamber. Also, the use of a simple blade of metal as part of the receiver kicks the case off of the bolt face, as the bolt travels back in the receiver. Our understanding of firearms is progressive over the years to the point where we can develop a reliable rifle that can fire thousands of rounds without a single jam.

A caseless firearm does not have a way to eject, or clear the chamber of a live round. It can be a potential danger when you have a failed primer, or when you need to make the firearm safe for transport, disassembly, and cleaning. In theory, caseless ammunition is operational and superior to cased ammo. However, the difficulty is the fact that all firearms are a tightly integrated weapon system.

The many attempts to popularize caseless ammunition are just the same as those of replacing steel cars with aluminum. A shorter cartridge cuts down on the distance the firearm's action must reciprocate to load a new round, which allows for higher cyclic rates and greater probability of multiple hits on a target at long range. Lack of a case also reduces the weight of the cartridge substantially, especially in small bore rifles. For example, the caseless ammunition for the Voere VEC weighs about one third as much as regular ammunition for the same caliber.

While it seems a simple operation to replace the case with a piece of solid propellant, the cartridge case provides more than just a way to keep the cartridge components together, and these other functions must be replaced if the case is to be replaced.

Caseless ammunition is not without its drawbacks, and it is these drawbacks that have kept modern caseless ammunition from achieving wider success. The first major problem, of special concern in military applications, which often involve sustained firing, is the heat sensitivity of the ammunition. One of the functions of the metallic cartridge case is as a heat sink ; when extracted after firing, every metallic case carries away a significant amount of the heat from the combustion of the propellant, slowing the rate at which heat builds up in the chamber.

The thermal insulation provided by the case also works the other way around, shielding the propellant from built-up heat in the chamber walls.

Without a case to provide these functions, caseless rounds using nitrocellulose will begin to cook off , firing from the residual chamber heat, much sooner than cased cartridges do. The normal solution to the problem of heat is to increase the heat resistance by switching to a propellant with a higher ignition temperature, typically a non-crystalline explosive carefully formulated to provide an appropriate rate of combustion.

Another important function provided by the cartridge is to seal the rear of the chamber. During firing of a cased cartridge, the pressure in the chamber expands the brass and blocks the chamber. This prevents gas exiting from the rear of the chamber, and it has also been experimentally shown to provide a significant amount of support to the bolt. Without the case to provide this seal, the firearm design must account for this and provide a means of sealing the rear of the chamber.

This problem was also encountered with the Dreyse needle gun; the French Chassepot solved the leaking-breech problem with the addition of a rubber seal to the bolt.

Telescoping caseless rounds must also deal with the issue of blocking the bore, as the bullet is surrounded by propellant. The booster charge is used to address this issue, providing an initial burst of pressure to force the bullet out of the cartridge body and into the barrel before the body combusts. Caseless rounds are limited by the fact that the cartridge body is primarily a propellant, and structural properties are secondary to the combustion properties.

The primary issue is one of extraction. While caseless ammunition eliminates the need to extract a fired case, unfired cases must be extracted in case of a misfire, or to unload the firearm.

In metallic cases, this ability is provided by a rim or extractor groove machined into the rear of the case. Even in completely plastic bodied cartridges, such as the Activ brand shotgun shells , a thin metal ring is molded into the rim to provide support for the extractor.

One of the first caseless firearm and ammunition systems produced was actually made by Daisy , the airgun maker, in



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000